Institution record
Bitonic
Bitonic B.V.
- Source score
- 1.3
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) | Relation number R125217 | Regulated | Bitonic B.V. | — |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bitonic against peer institutions in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitonic (this record) | De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 1.3 | 0 |
| LiteBit | De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) | 0 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 1.0 | 0 |
| BKN301 | Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Change | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)AFM | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Crypto Brokers | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 3.0 | 0 |
| OMGFIN | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 1.0 | 0 |
Bitonic: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Bitonic's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Bitonic (legal entity reference: Bitonic B.V.) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) — licence Relation number R125217, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) public register.
Which of Bitonic's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe. 1 of Bitonic's 1 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) (licence Relation number R125217, regulated, entity: Bitonic B.V.). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is Bitonic's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Bitonic carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 1.3, risk & licensing: 1.4, brand: 1.5, market influence: 1.6, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitonic's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitonic, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (bitonic.nl) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB).
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Euro Firm Ledger relevant to Bitonic's supervisory scope.
EEA Passporting
Continental European Firm Roll: Auditing 564 EEA & Swiss Financial Institutions Across MiFID II and MiCA Passports
Tracking how investment firms and digital asset service providers headquartered in Germany, Cyprus, France, Switzerland, and the Netherlands deploy EEA passports.
Competent Authorities
National Competent Authority Tie-Out: Cross-Checking BaFin, AMF, CySEC, and FINMA Registers Against GLEIF LEI Records
Eliminating cross-border clone risk in the European Economic Area by tying national authorisation numbers to active GLEIF Legal Entity Identifiers.