Institution record
Evest Official
- Source score
- 5.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Financial Sector Conduct Authority | 36060 | Regulated | ATRIAFINANCIAL SA (PTY) LTD | 2008-09-09 |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Evest Official against peer institutions in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evest Official (this record) | FSCA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| BKN301 | Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM)Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino (CBSM) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Change | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)AFM | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
| Crypto Brokers | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 3.0 | 0 |
| OMGFIN | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 1.0 | 0 |
| FundsDLT | CSSF | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
Evest Official: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Evest Official's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Evest Official (legal entity reference: Evest Official) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: FSCA (Financial Sector Conduct Authority) — licence 36060, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official FSCA public register.
Which of Evest Official's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Evest Official is tracked under our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (multi-asset financial services) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (FSCA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Evest Official's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Evest Official carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Evest Official's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Evest Official, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (evest.com) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to FSCA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Euro Firm Ledger relevant to Evest Official's supervisory scope.
EEA Passporting
Continental European Firm Roll: Auditing 564 EEA & Swiss Financial Institutions Across MiFID II and MiCA Passports
Tracking how investment firms and digital asset service providers headquartered in Germany, Cyprus, France, Switzerland, and the Netherlands deploy EEA passports.
Competent Authorities
National Competent Authority Tie-Out: Cross-Checking BaFin, AMF, CySEC, and FINMA Registers Against GLEIF LEI Records
Eliminating cross-border clone risk in the European Economic Area by tying national authorisation numbers to active GLEIF Legal Entity Identifiers.